Culture and communication
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present research discusses the danger of minimizing the word culture. Although it has many different meanings, it is important to reach a consensus to ensure that humanity continues its path towards evolution, thus building a more equitable society, where values and ethics emerge as a Gold Standard to preserve the environment. The symbolic interactionism shows that human beings continuously generate meaning-making processes. In this scenario, the absence or lack of family education, and school and academic training, causes human beings to process their emotions in a wrong way, going as far as the cruelest individualism.
Human beings, concerned about scientific evolution, forget about the spiritual evolution, which feeds culture according to the canons of their essence as people. It is evident the lack of empathy and the individualism that are revealed in the form of selfishness and difficulty to view others as equals. Therefore, we must commit ourselves to rescue human culture.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
If the manuscript is approved for publication, the authors retain the copyright but grant the journal exclusive rights to publish, edit, reproduce, distribute, display, and disseminate it, both domestically and internationally, using print and electronic media in various databases.
How to Cite
References
Bacco, B. (s.f.). Claude Lévi-Strauss. Comunidad Virtual Russell. http://www.comunidadrussell.com/default.asp?contenidos/textos/levi-strauss.html
Berlo, D. (2000). El proceso de la comunicación: Introducción a la teoría y la práctica (2.a ed.). El Ateneo.
Eco, U. (2000). Tratado de semiótica general (5.a ed.). Lumen.
Fernández, C. y Galguera, L. (2009). Teorías de la comunicación. Mc Graw Hill.
Golte, J. (2001). Cultura, racionalidad y migración andina. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
Habermas, J. (2001). Teoría de la acción comunicativa, I. Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social (3.ª ed.). Taurus.
Hall, S. (1994). Estudios Culturales: dos paradigmas. Causas y azares, 1, 1-18. https://estudioscultura.wordpress.com/category/teoricos/stuarthall/#:~:text=Hall%20identifica%20dos-%20significados%20del,el%20dominio%20de%20unos%20cuantos.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI). (s.f.). Estadística de Seguridad Ciudadana (Informe Técnico). https://www.inei.gob.pe/biblioteca-virtual/boletines/estadisticas-de-seguridad-ciudadana/1/
Leuridan, J. (2019). El sentido de las dimensiones éticas de la vida. Fondo Editorial, Universidad de San Martín de Porres.
Levine, D. (Ed.). (1971). Simmel: On individuality and social forms. University Press.
Malinowski, B. (1984). Una teoría científica de la cultura. Sarpe.
Mattelart, A. y Neveu, E. (2004). Introducción a los estudios culturales. Paidós.
Portocarrero, G. y Komadina, J. (2001). Modelos de Identidad y sentidos de pertenencia en el Perú y Bolivia. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
Quezada, O. (1996). Semiosis, conocimiento y comunicación. Universidad de Lima, Fondo de Desarrollo Editorial.
Tylor, E. B. (1976). Cultura Primitiva. Ayuso.
Wolton, D. (2006). Salvemos la comunicación. Gedisa.